# 2.86f - Displaying UNSYNCEDLYRICS language

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/2-86f-displaying-unsyncedlyrics-language/41109
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [March 17, 2018, 11:22am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/2-86f-displaying-unsyncedlyrics-language/41109 "2018-03-17T11:22:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tagger](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/tagger/32/11538_2.png) [@tagger](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/tagger)
#### Post date: [May 8, 2022, 9:30am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/2-86f-displaying-unsyncedlyrics-language/41109/6 "2022-05-08T09:30:21Z")

</div>

Hello @Florian, I was just wondering perhaps you could make this legacy feature a toggle-able option? (which defaults to hide language code (suitable for most average users), but toggle-able to allow advanced users like @poster to define their own language code), this can probably make everyone happy.

Another big reason is:  
The [Comments frame](https://id3.org/id3v2.3.0#Comments) and [Unsynced Lyrics frame](https://id3.org/id3v2.3.0#Unsychronised_lyrics.2Ftext_transcription) both have the **same frame structure** (as can be seen and compared in both two referenced ID3v2 standards links), but the Comments frame **hides the language code** , whereas the Unsynced Lyrics frame **doesn't**. This seems kinda inconsistent for two frames with the same structure, so adding the previosly mentioned toggle-able option can solve that problem.

My another related post: [About the Language Code for Comment and Unsynced Lyrics](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/about-the-language-code-for-comment-and-unsynced-lyrics/57228/11)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/2-86f-displaying-unsyncedlyrics-language/41109)._
