# Bulk updating Tags

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/bulk-updating-tags/13856
**Category:** General Discussion
**Created:** [September 8, 2012, 10:23pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/bulk-updating-tags/13856 "2012-09-08T22:23:30Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![HansBKK](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/5daacb/32.png) [@HansBKK](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/HansBKK)
#### Post date: [September 9, 2012, 3:31am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/bulk-updating-tags/13856/6 "2012-09-09T03:31:30Z")

</div>

> [@Dego](#):
>
> Reason being is that I am an expert with Excel and have functions and macros that will clean the tags very quickly (20,000 tags). I could also use looks-ups to check the integrity of the data.  
> Could some body give me the details how this could be done please.

Seems to be topic of the day 🕶

If you're truly an expert you've probably overcome them, but I've been annoyed too many times by Excel's idiosyncrasies wrt generic CSV processing, it seems to reflect MS's arrogance about it knows better than the user and doesn't respect the standard out of the box.

See [this post](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/13857/2) and[this one](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/13826/7) (also linked in the former) for my preferred toolset ATM, but of course feel free to ignore this if you really prefer to work in Excel that much.

But even then you may want to have a look at CSVed's "export to XLS" feature set - just the fact of its complexity is quite an eye-opener.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/bulk-updating-tags/13856)._
