# Detecting the real quality

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/detecting-the-real-quality/17382
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [November 16, 2015, 8:50pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/detecting-the-real-quality/17382 "2015-11-16T20:50:40Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zerow](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/zerow/32/11379_2.png) [@Zerow](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Zerow)
#### Post date: [January 26, 2016, 8:09pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/detecting-the-real-quality/17382/5 "2016-01-26T20:09:45Z")

</div>

> [@zerow](#):
>
> [...]  
> So for now I use my ears  
> [...]  
> And in something like 9 out 10 cases I am correct in my estimates; which means if I hear a bad quality then in the spectrogram I can see a proof of that. But that takes way too much time and totally disrupts my workflow

It seems that sometimes the spectrogram shows something completely different from what I'm hearing with my own ears: [/t/17591/1](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/17591/1)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/detecting-the-real-quality/17382)._