# Enhancing core metadata features: move randomizing, add chapter support

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/enhancing-core-metadata-features-move-randomizing-add-chapter-support/69411
**Category:** General Discussion
**Created:** [August 13, 2025, 9:51pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/enhancing-core-metadata-features-move-randomizing-add-chapter-support/69411 "2025-08-13T21:51:58Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ohrenkino](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/ohrenkino/32/4843_2.png) [@ohrenkino](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/ohrenkino)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2025, 6:52am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/enhancing-core-metadata-features-move-randomizing-add-chapter-support/69411/3 "2025-08-14T06:52:12Z")

</div>

> [@DataCleaner](#):
>
> I would suggest that this behavior be changed to the expected sort,

Looks to me as though you never used View\>Sort by ... in which you can select the column by which you want to sort - even if it is not in the current view. You only have to include the preferred data somewhere as a column.  
The point that other users who used the randomizing function would have to learn a new behaviour is still valid.  
If I look at the repeated support pleas which ask where the user-defined genres have gone and a special [HowTo](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/add-custom-user-defined-genres/61122) had to be created to reduce the number of repeated explanations, I rate the modification of an established function as a really bad idea.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/enhancing-core-metadata-features-move-randomizing-add-chapter-support/69411)._