# \[F\] Several inconsistencies & bugs in saving FLAC tags

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-several-inconsistencies-bugs-in-saving-flac-tags/7278
**Category:** Fixed Bugs
**Tags:** bug-fixed
**Created:** [October 3, 2008, 12:15pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-several-inconsistencies-bugs-in-saving-flac-tags/7278 "2008-10-03T12:15:57Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://community.mp3tag.de/uploads/default/original/2X/c/ce7035d426cb755a7916793326d23b465222a407.png) [@system](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/system)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2008, 8:25pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-several-inconsistencies-bugs-in-saving-flac-tags/7278/8 "2008-12-12T20:25:41Z")

</div>

Finally, thank you.

But, your response was a HUGE disappointment. ☹ ☹

1-2. Lame excuse, not possible? You're the coder, you've the power to change it. Right? [DetlevD is backing me on this that these are BUGS](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/7213/11).  
3. Ok.  
4. In short: lame. So I should populate all my empty tag values (which are set that way when the FLAC file is encoded) if I ever want to use your software?! Sheesh, that's lame.

I'm really disappointed after waiting several months.. and because now I've to find me a new tagging software.. and not just because you won't implement the feature in the 4th list item.. it's the 1-2 list items, I thought that those would be a clear case.

Oh well, I think that I should say thanks anyways, so, thanks, and bye (I'll follow this thread for some time).

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-several-inconsistencies-bugs-in-saving-flac-tags/7278)._