# \[F\] TDAT incorrectly written in v2.58

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-tdat-incorrectly-written-in-v2-58/15359
**Category:** Fixed Bugs
**Tags:** bug-fixed
**Created:** [January 4, 2014, 10:08pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-tdat-incorrectly-written-in-v2-58/15359 "2014-01-04T22:08:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bee-liever](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/c4cdca/32.png) [@Bee-liever](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Bee-liever)
#### Post date: [January 5, 2014, 8:29am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-tdat-incorrectly-written-in-v2-58/15359/3 "2014-01-05T08:29:09Z")

</div>

> [@ohrenkino](#):
>
> The standard fields for dates are YEAR and/or RELEASEDATE.

Whose standard? Mp3tag or ID3?  
In ID3v2.3 DATE is the standard frame name for TDAT.  
If I use RELEASEDATE, it merely writes a TXXX/RELEASEDATE frame instead of a TXXX/DATE frame.

So when Florian said:

> [@Mp3tag v2.58 released](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/mp3tag-v2-58-released/15083/1):
>
> With Mp3tag v2.58 we revert this change to the previous behavior.

it's not entirely correct, as DATE or %date% worked as per ID3v2.3 standard in v2.52

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/f-tdat-incorrectly-written-in-v2-58/15359)._