I love the 5 sizes: Multi-line, Large, Medium, Small, and smaller, but I would love a smallest field that will at least get you 5 (preferably 6) fields per line. Sometimes you just need 6 or less characters to populate what you want on a field. It would be great as far as an economy of display real…

Thanks for all your ideas! I've just released Mp3tag v3.19a and added the Tag Panel field sizes Full, Larger, Large, Medium, Small, Smaller, and Tiny. I've also added ellipsis to field names that might get truncated on resize.

[image] esumsea: Sometimes you just need 6 or less characters to populate what you want on a field. It would be great as far as an economy of display real estate to have smaller fields so one can fit more info into the tag panel. I agree that it would be nice to have even smaller fields possi…

[image] poster: I agree that it would be nice to have even smaller fields possible +1 :+1: Typical real examples for "smallest" field size would be YEAR, DISCNUMBER, TRACK for example: [image] As you can see it would be enough width if 4 or 5 letters like Year or Track could be placed as d…

Rating, Dynamic Range, disc number, track number, movement number, year, release, there are so many that can be even 1 or 2 characters. In fact there could be an argument for 2 smaller sizes: smallest and mini, the later being for fields that require 3 or less characters, and the former being for 6-…

I think like poster touched on at a certain width the label of the field would be longer than the field itself, such as 'Publisher', 'Total Discs', etc. Just tested how the window reacts to four of the current shortest fields in one row and any two-word (or more) label names truncate to just the fi…

There are those GIFs! Yep, I would not. But as I read in another thread about this subject, this is where further customization would really be the way to go. There are several programs I use, foobar being one of them, that allow you to customize UI to your heart's content, like changing character …

[image] LaurenBacall: I think like poster touched on at a certain width the label of the field would be longer than the field itself, such as 'Publisher', 'Total Discs', etc. I even have some user-defined fields which are only meant for 1 character, i.e. a field for live-recordings which is o…

Great! This was #1 on my wishlist. Mp3tag got significantly higher level of useability and user-friendliness. Many thanks

Thank you Florian for the amazing updates! :raised_hands: :clap: :+1: My donation has already been sent. This time a little bit more because some of these updates will really help. I only wish I could donate more. I am so excited about some of these features! :exploding_head:

As much as I LOVE this addition, it does seem like there is space for a smaller field than tiny. Something for 6 characters or less, which would be half the size of the smaller field. The Tiny field is about 66-75% of the smaller field. Maybe a minuscule, mini or tiniest field.

Feature Request: Smallest Field Size

General Discussion

MotleyG March 15, 2023, 5:43pm 12

This reply in another thread from @Florian should explain the size decisions. Perhaps your screen resolution or panel size is driving the slightly wider width of the Tiny field size.