# Feature Request: Smallest Field Size **URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/feature-request-smallest-field-size/60179 **Category:** General Discussion **Created:** [February 23, 2023, 9:11pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/feature-request-smallest-field-size/60179 "2023-02-23T21:11:20Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 12
### Author: ![MotleyG](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/motleyg/32/440_2.png) [@MotleyG](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/MotleyG) #### Post date: [March 15, 2023, 5:43pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/feature-request-smallest-field-size/60179/12 "2023-03-15T17:43:58Z")
This reply in another thread from @Florian should explain the size decisions. Perhaps your screen resolution or panel size is driving the slightly wider width of the Tiny field size. > [@New tag panel field size "Tiny" is too small?](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/new-tag-panel-field-size-tiny-is-too-small/60325/8): > > I've noticed that I didn't answer your initial question: I've tried to make it fit at least one character with the Tag Panel on its smallest width. Depending on the Windows DPI settings (text size percentage) it can also hold two numbers, but I've observed that it's getting more narrow the higher the percentage. My idea was to allow for really tiny fields (e.g., holding only 1 or 0 for COMPILATION) if necessary. If it's really too narrow, field size Smaller or a slightly wider Tag Panel should… --- _[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/feature-request-smallest-field-size/60179)._