# Is the Date format actually supposed to be a "Double-Date"...? i.e. 1999\\\\1999

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-the-date-format-actually-supposed-to-be-a-double-date-i-e-1999-1999/54634
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [October 6, 2021, 1:05am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-the-date-format-actually-supposed-to-be-a-double-date-i-e-1999-1999/54634 "2021-10-06T01:05:09Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![poster](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/poster/32/4881_2.png) [@poster](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/poster)
#### Post date: [October 8, 2021, 6:17am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-the-date-format-actually-supposed-to-be-a-double-date-i-e-1999-1999/54634/10 "2021-10-08T06:17:14Z")

</div>

> [@Double records in YEAR ex (2012/2012)](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/double-records-in-year-ex-2012-2012/49830/2):
>
> Have a loook with the extended Tag-View (ALT-t). You will see that there are 2 year-tag-fields. In the extended tag-view you can delete one of these. There is also an action of the type "Remove Duplicate Fields". A possible reason why this happened maybe the use of Mediamonkey for tagging. If you use Mediamonkey and want to use it also in the future: there is a setting in Mediamonkey that can avoid this. Add this to the file mediamonkey.ini: [MP3Tagging] DisableFrames=TDRC;TDOR; Enable…

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-the-date-format-actually-supposed-to-be-a-double-date-i-e-1999-1999/54634)._