# Is there a problem with certain JPG types?

**URL:** <https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-there-a-problem-with-certain-jpg-types/49803>\
**Category:** Support\
**Created:** [August 1, 2020, 3:51pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-there-a-problem-with-certain-jpg-types/49803 "2020-08-01T15:51:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vilsen](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/v/e95f7d/32.png) [@vilsen](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/vilsen)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2020, 2:13pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-there-a-problem-with-certain-jpg-types/49803/8 "2020-08-02T14:13:58Z")

</div>

Well baseline jpeg's would at least be as future-proof as it gets and I can't see jpeg's disappearing any time soon.

Lack of support for progressive jpeg's has been reported on players from various brands, even though progressive is part of the standard. Probably a rare issue on newer players though.

I use exiftool to check jpeg's for progressive or baseline. It's the quickest way I have yet found. Just drop the picture on the "exiftool(-k)" icon (exe or shortcut). For embedded pictures, drag them from Mp3tag to the hard disk first.

[https://exiftool.org/index.html](https://exiftool.org/index.html)  
[https://exiftool.org/install.html](https://exiftool.org/install.html)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/is-there-a-problem-with-certain-jpg-types/49803)._