# Plea for WAV Support

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/plea-for-wav-support/13791
**Category:** General Discussion
**Created:** [August 24, 2012, 7:31am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/plea-for-wav-support/13791 "2012-08-24T07:31:28Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![rlevis](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/r/aeb1de/32.png) [@rlevis](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/rlevis)
#### Post date: [August 24, 2012, 7:31am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/plea-for-wav-support/13791/1 "2012-08-24T07:31:28Z")

</div>

[http://forums.mp3tag.de/lofiversion/index.php/t8328.html](http://forums.mp3tag.de/lofiversion/index.php/t8328.html)  
As in this older discussion, I also would also like MP3Tag to support WAV fmt/LIST chunk tags. I would also want APEv2 tag support for WAV files.

Cheers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Oblio](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/oblio/32/4828_2.png) [@Oblio](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Oblio)
#### Post date: [September 19, 2012, 5:05am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/plea-for-wav-support/13791/2 "2012-09-19T05:05:31Z")

</div>

Yes please, I guess if we keep on asking...

Now that _ **Foobar2000 supports wav file tagging** _ since V1.1.9 that's as close as it comes to being official maybe?

Other software that supports it -

dbPowerAmp  
Jriver  
Tag&Rename  
Winamp?  
iTunes?

others?

> [@Ross](#):
>
> [http://forums.mp3tag.de/lofiversion/index.php/t8328.html](http://forums.mp3tag.de/lofiversion/index.php/t8328.html)  
> As in this older discussion, I also would also like MP3Tag to support WAV fmt/LIST chunk tags. I would also want APEv2 tag support for WAV files.
> 
> Cheers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![HansBKK](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/5daacb/32.png) [@HansBKK](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/HansBKK)
#### Post date: [September 20, 2012, 1:37am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/plea-for-wav-support/13791/3 "2012-09-20T01:37:47Z")

</div>

Why not take advantage of a lossless format like FLAC?

Not trolling here I promise, I'm genuinely curious what advantage using WAV directly could hold; to me it's is just an intermediate format when it's necessary to edit the audio itself, not for metadata or archival storage.

I realize disk space is cheap but it's not free, and I can't say I've ever had an issue with decoding time, unless you're storing chunks that are hours long. . .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Oblio](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/oblio/32/4828_2.png) [@Oblio](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Oblio)
#### Post date: [September 25, 2012, 3:36am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/plea-for-wav-support/13791/4 "2012-09-25T03:36:27Z")

</div>

There are some situations (e.g. some broadcasters) where wav is the only acceptable format (yes wav as opposed to bwav which is also used). I assume it is simpler for them to use wav for archiving just to avoid the conversion times, regardless of disk space cost.

It is also the most platform/OS/codec agnostic format. Sometimes you might want that.

The fact that more and more software is supporting it means there must be a demand. It has certainly been requested here more than once.
