# Suggestion: allow individual order of Action Groups in Presets (formerly Utils)

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/suggestion-allow-individual-order-of-action-groups-in-presets-formerly-utils/53556
**Category:** General Discussion
**Created:** [June 18, 2021, 10:42pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/suggestion-allow-individual-order-of-action-groups-in-presets-formerly-utils/53556 "2021-06-18T22:42:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![incifinci](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/incifinci/32/6526_2.png) [@incifinci](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/incifinci)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2021, 10:42pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/suggestion-allow-individual-order-of-action-groups-in-presets-formerly-utils/53556/1 "2021-06-18T22:42:38Z")

</div>

The Presets of Action Groups (factually more complex macros) are a very nice feature. Unfortunately, not so ideal, as it could be.

I have many and well-organized (with #) Action Groups, in an appropriate order. But sometimes i want to create a Preset, in which the order is different. It is not possible. I also need to change the order within the action groups (and save it), as i want the order to execute them in the Preset. I tried to rearrange Action Groups afterwards, but it does not work again.

Why i need? Example.  
Action groups (simplified detail):  
Spelling#Title#Capital letters only at sentence start and after square brackets  
Spelling#Title#Replace round brackets with square brackets

But in Preset i want reverse order. The results are, of course, different.  
Source: El Andaluz (Träume Sterben Nie)  
Result 1 (the desired): El andaluz [**T** räume sterben nie]  
Result 2 (without reverting the order): El andaluz [**t** räume sterben nie]

This Preset is just one little example. I can not (do not want) change the appropriate order of the Action Groups. And i also do not want to do a lot of the same Action Groups (with copying them -- by the way, really "copying" simply is impossible, too), because it can slow down Mp3tag, and (more important) i need all potential future changes evaluate in all examples of the Action Group -- not a good solution.

Or is there any better workaround? If not, so this is a suggestion for future updates.