# Track Listings from Discogs mess up track numbering under certain circumstances

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/track-listings-from-discogs-mess-up-track-numbering-under-certain-circumstances/48026
**Category:** Web Sources Discussion
**Created:** [February 28, 2020, 3:19am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/track-listings-from-discogs-mess-up-track-numbering-under-certain-circumstances/48026 "2020-02-28T03:19:37Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zerow](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/zerow/32/11379_2.png) [@Zerow](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Zerow)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2020, 2:52pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/track-listings-from-discogs-mess-up-track-numbering-under-certain-circumstances/48026/2 "2020-03-07T14:52:01Z")

</div>

> [@JeremyForThaWin](#):
>
> I realize this is super specific, but I guess thats why we send in reports!
> 
> When getting a track listing via discogs where an individual track is split up into sub-tracks, the information is displayed as if they are individual tracks which messes up the numbering.  
> [...]

Well

I myself a long time ago decided to use for `TRACK` as system of `0.0` which can be extended to `0.0-0`, where 0 represents the number of disc and all that follows the `.` are the actual numbers of tracks on a given album; thus eliminating the need to use any kind of `DISCS` field. So for example Discosogs "Sandstorms" by Carl Craig described as `5-B` would [most likely] be [as I have not listens to that album] described in my system as 1.9. and If I were to keep it together in one file with the next track "Squirrel Bait" by Daniel Bell], I would describe it as 1.9-10

Such approach of course would be hard to integrate with automatic download of tags from database and it has some limitations in regards to some formats [[[X] Can't copy some unusual TRACK tags from MP3 / FLAC to WMA](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-cant-copy-some-unusual-track-tags-from-mp3-flac-to-wma/17714)]

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/track-listings-from-discogs-mess-up-track-numbering-under-certain-circumstances/48026)._
