# Unexpected behaviour when replacing variations of feat

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/unexpected-behaviour-when-replacing-variations-of-feat/44478
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [February 10, 2019, 10:11pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/unexpected-behaviour-when-replacing-variations-of-feat/44478 "2019-02-10T22:11:51Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![LyricsLover](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/c6cbf5/32.png) [@LyricsLover](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/LyricsLover)
#### Post date: [February 11, 2019, 7:51am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/unexpected-behaviour-when-replacing-variations-of-feat/44478/5 "2019-02-11T07:51:23Z")

</div>

> [@sheepdisease](#):
>
> That online tool looks good, could you please explain how I would input my example into it to test it? I'm not sure.

 ![regex101](https://community.mp3tag.de/uploads/default/original/2X/8/8c6a057732ecd74bd8b1b3a8ebbfb6e66180e45c.png)

.  
BTW: Do you remember your post [Replay gain code - #4 by LyricsLover](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/replay-gain-code/42347/4)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/unexpected-behaviour-when-replacing-variations-of-feat/44478)._