# \[WS\] Discogs ALL

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/ws-discogs-all/8641
**Category:** Broken Web Sources
**Created:** [July 20, 2009, 6:31pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/ws-discogs-all/8641 "2009-07-20T18:31:17Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 219

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pone](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/pone/32/272_2.png) [@pone](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/pone)
#### Post date: [April 6, 2012, 7:49pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/ws-discogs-all/8641/219 "2012-04-06T19:49:45Z")

</div>

> [@Question](#):
>
> You don't get me. I need to write main artist and featuring artist together into the ARTIST field to get something like this:
> 
> Script works fine for releases like [this](http://www.discogs.com/release/1227955) but it fails for previously mentioned ones.
> 
> Vast majority of discogs' releases has  
> form instead of  
> In the latter case featuring artist stored in xml tag, not . That's the problem.

Login at discogs and change the format of the page 😉

What you are asking for isn't easy to do.  
I'm working on a new discogs script at the moment, which will be able to split certain roles (like featuring) from the extraartist field and write it to a extra field. However, I was only thinking for extra fields like COMPOSER and so long, joining these fields with the existing ARTIST field is another problem. I'm not sure if I can build that in.

Anyway, here is a topic about a similar problem. I think you could adopt this action to Pufas' script output and your desired "featuring" role. You will also have to make sure that the ARIST field don't gets completly overwritten.  
[/t/13197/1](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/13197/1)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/ws-discogs-all/8641)._