# \[X\] Can't copy some unusual TRACK tags from MP3 / FLAC to WMA

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-cant-copy-some-unusual-track-tags-from-mp3-flac-to-wma/17714
**Category:** No Bugs
**Created:** [March 4, 2016, 10:40am UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-cant-copy-some-unusual-track-tags-from-mp3-flac-to-wma/17714 "2016-03-04T10:40:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zerow](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/zerow/32/11379_2.png) [@Zerow](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Zerow)
#### Post date: [March 4, 2016, 7:52pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-cant-copy-some-unusual-track-tags-from-mp3-flac-to-wma/17714/5 "2016-03-04T19:52:50Z")

</div>

> [@ryerman](#):
>
> This is not a bug, but the result of an Mp3tag feature.
> 
> WMA files use ASF (Advanced Systems Format) tags.  
> [...]  
> You may ask, "How does Mp3tag write those tags?"
> 
> Only the developer knows for sure  
> [...]

You mean developer of Mp3tag: [Florian](https://forums.mp3tag.de/index.php?showuser=203%20)?

Or developers of WMA container format?

I took a shoot at another format [because I'm looking for another lossless format to use aside from FLAC]: WavPack

WV files seem to behave the same as MP3s and FLACs. There is no problem with unusual data that I use in the TRACK field. And I've also tested to same extend other fields in that format, with different signs

But the TRACK field WVA bug question remains: should or shouldn't it behave the same as MP3 / FLAC / WV in Mp3tag?

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-cant-copy-some-unusual-track-tags-from-mp3-flac-to-wma/17714)._