# \[X\] Display of post-terminator chars non-complies with ID3 V2.3

**URL:** https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-display-of-post-terminator-chars-non-complies-with-id3-v2-3/8959
**Category:** No Bugs
**Created:** [September 15, 2009, 10:26pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-display-of-post-terminator-chars-non-complies-with-id3-v2-3/8959 "2009-09-15T22:26:35Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![chrisjj](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/a698b9/32.png) [@chrisjj](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/chrisjj)
#### Post date: [September 15, 2009, 10:26pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-display-of-post-terminator-chars-non-complies-with-id3-v2-3/8959/1 "2009-09-15T22:26:35Z")

</div>

1 Ensure Options, Tags, Mpeg, Read, [X] ID3v2  
2 Load an MP3 file having a ID3v2.3 text frame having post-terminator characters e.g. **bbb**  
 ![](http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/3486/picct.png)  
3 In the tag panel, inspect Artist

Expected: aaa  
Observed: aaa\\bbb

This is a failure to comply with the spec: [http://www.id3.org/d3v2.3.0](http://www.id3.org/d3v2.3.0) says

4.2. Text information frames  
... If the textstring is followed by a termination  
($00 (00)) all the following information  
should be ignored and not be displayed.

4.2.1. Text information frames - details  
TPE1  
...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Florian](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/florian/32/5759_2.png) [@Florian](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Florian)
#### Post date: [September 16, 2009, 1:25pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-display-of-post-terminator-chars-non-complies-with-id3-v2-3/8959/2 "2009-09-16T13:25:05Z")

</div>

This different interpretation of the specification is intended. There are two many files and programs out there, that treat the separator as in ID3v2.4 so if Mp3tag would do differently, there would be a lot more reports than those few which point to the misinterpretation of the spec.

I think it simply doesn't hurt to interpret it in this way.

I mark it as [X] where it means "Won't Fix" this time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![chrisjj](https://community.mp3tag.de/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/a698b9/32.png) [@chrisjj](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/chrisjj)
#### Post date: [September 16, 2009, 1:59pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-display-of-post-terminator-chars-non-complies-with-id3-v2-3/8959/3 "2009-09-16T13:59:53Z")

</div>

> This different interpretation of the specification is intended.

This is not a different interpretation of "the following information should be ignored and not be displayed". This is just failing to comply.

> I mark it as where it means "Won't Fix" this time.

OK! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Florian](https://community.mp3tag.de/user_avatar/community.mp3tag.de/florian/32/5759_2.png) [@Florian](https://community.mp3tag.de/u/Florian)
#### Post date: [December 28, 2018, 2:26pm UTC](https://community.mp3tag.de/t/x-display-of-post-terminator-chars-non-complies-with-id3-v2-3/8959/4 "2018-12-28T14:26:34Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
