Hello Florian and forum members,
I hope you will not mind me opening a new topic.
My previous support topic regarding APEv2 tags was correctly diagnosed and resolved, and I appreciate the help I received there.
However, while investigating metadata across a larger archive, I realised that my underlying concern was slightly different from the issue discussed in that thread.
This is therefore not a support request and not a bug report.
Instead, it is a feature suggestion relating to metadata transparency and provenance.
Before continuing, I would like to explain the repeated appearance of the word "Fuckingham" below.
The word is not being repeated for shock value or provocation. It is the actual historical event name stored within the metadata of the file being discussed.
The distinction between:
Fuckingham Palace
and:
F*ckingham Palace
is central to the example.
While preparing an archive recording for possible public release, I intentionally edited various metadata fields to use the censored form "F*ckingham Palace" for public-facing consistency.
During later verification, I noticed that different applications appeared to display different values.
This was not important because of the specific word involved.
It was important because it made me realise that I was asking a different question:
Not:
"What is the title?"
but:
"Which metadata frame supplied this title?"
and:
"Which metadata container supplied this value?"
After investigating the file, I found myself repeatedly wanting to see four things together:
Display Name
MP3Tag Variable
Actual Frame Name
Container Type
For example:
Title | %title% | TIT2 | ID3v2.3
rather than simply:
Title
Likewise, if multiple metadata containers exist within a file, an optional advanced view could potentially show:
ID3v2/TIT2 = value
ID3v1/TITLE = value
APEv2/TITLE = value
This would not change any existing behaviour.
It would simply expose information that MP3Tag already understands internally.
For everyday tagging, the current interface is ideal.
For archival work, preservation projects, metadata migration, troubleshooting, and auditing large collections, understanding the provenance of a value can be just as important as the value itself.
I am therefore wondering whether an optional advanced mode showing:
• MP3Tag variable
• Actual frame name
• Container type
• Value
might be useful for users working with complex collections.
Thank you again for all the work you put into MP3Tag and for taking the time to consider the suggestion.
PS. I'm still gradually learning the terminology and underlying standards involved here, so if I've used any terms incorrectly, please feel free to correct me. Part of the reason I'm asking these questions is that I'm trying to become more self-sufficient and avoid repeatedly taking up other people's time when I can research and verify things myself. AI tools have helped me get much further than I otherwise could have, but I remain aware that there are gaps in my understanding. I hope this example is specific enough to justify a fresh thread and that it comes across in the constructive spirit intended. Thank you for your patience and for sharing your expertise.
Thanks, Fez @ KS
