Bottom line, I'm trying to see if there is a way to go to the Next Directory Sequentially, and load the files
Here's my situation.
In my classical albums they are in this format: \music\artist\album
There are time I may need to correct all artist names for "Bela Bartok", for example. In this case I have about 18 album directories under Bartok, Bela.
I may have albums with artist in varying values: Bela Bartok, Bella Bartok, Bartok, B. Bartok, etc.
I will be changing all to Bela Bartok.
In this case I cannot do my typical right click at the artist directory level, select all, and change the name because, (in the case of many classical albums), there are many of them that are compilations with other artists on albums. So I really need to change them one album at a time.
For now, I have to go into each album. If all tracks are Bartok, then select all and fix name.
If Bartok is only a few tracks, then select them and make the change.
Then go to the next directory and start over. In this example there is only 18. I have at least 2000 classical CDs, So when I have to go fix the Mahler's.....well in my case I have almost 150.
Enough background, you get the picture. This would be nice in this case if I could do this:
I'd start my work by: 1) going to the albums sub-directories under artist and 2) right click on the first album, make my changes and save.
then while still in MP3tag - and this is what my whole goal is here!!!!,
have a button, or action pull down, MP3Tag script - whatever to do this:
- Go to the next album directory and load only those files
(ideally, it would be great if not only it would load the next album, but also auto "select-all" files, asked around here a long time - don't worry, I'm not starting on that right here and now)
I think this would be a great feature for anyone who wants to sequentially work down a directory level individually loading the next album to work on.
Right now you either close and right click on the next directory and select all again or do the Control-D or browse thing. This really could be an improvement in workflow.
I would not be totally surprised if this has already be requested, addressed and explained. If that is the case - very sorry for the trouble, I couldn't find it.
Thanks in advance to all (I love this place)
Steve