Hi, this are the files I ripped and batch encoded, but Mp3tag (3.28) detects one file differently (wrong?). [2024-12-31_002108]

I tried to rerip and encode the track again using the same tools, but I could not reproduce the problem. Audio data is the same, so I suspect it might have been somehow caused by the wrong metadata write? I am using Discogs as a Tag source. I used MP3val to fix the file. By the way, when comparin…

You can check this file with MPEG 1 Layer I with the tools mentioned here: [image] How to check files for errors? Howto It’s required and often helps to reduce support cycles to check files for errors before filing a bug report. Symptoms of erroneous files are…

Interesting. MP3val reports: (offset 0x10b0): MPEG stream error, resynchronized successfully VBR detected, but no VBR header is present. Seeking may not work properly. Non-layer-III frame encountered. See related INFO message for details. Different MPEG versions or layers in one file. See relat…

Only a file without findings is a good file. And right now you have 2 applications that report problems. I would still investigate why this file leads to findings and others don't.

[image] tor11: What could cause this? [image] tor11: I ripped and batch encoded For short: Your ripping software or your batch encoding software. You have to check which one create this MPEG 1 Layer I / Stereo for this specific file. As we don't know what do you use and how you have…

[image] tor11: A simple copy Tag copy in Mp3tag didn't 'fix' it. If the audio part is damaged then MP3tag does not help a lot as MP3tag does not treat the audio part. The original problem was that 2 programs reported a problem and you doubted that this was correct. After you re-encoded the …

Yes, I haven't encountered the 'wrong' Codec problem after ripping and encoding the file again.

Wrong Codec / Mode detection?

Support

LyricsLover December 31, 2024, 7:14am 2

You can check this file with MPEG 1 Layer I with the tools mentioned here:

Or - if possible - you can share this track and we can have a look at it.